PAGE FROM THE PAST
Excerpt from the Brown v. Board of Education decision with blue underlines on key phrases like "inherently unequal."
Chief Justice Earl Warren underlined phrases to emphasize in his reading copy of the Brown v. Board of Education opinion. Manuscript Division
Architectural view of the U.S. Supreme Court building facade, featuring the "Equal Justice Under Law" inscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court building. Carol M. Highsmith Archive/Prints and Photographs Division
Handwritten letter on Supreme Court stationery dated May 17, 1954, beginning "Dear Chief: This is a day that will live in glory."
“This is a day that will live in glory,” Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote in this note to Warren. Manuscript Division

‘A Day That Will Live in Glory’

With Brown v. Board, court ends school segregation.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education on May 17, 1954, was one of the most momentous decisions in American history and is exhaustively documented at the Library. A unanimous court emphatically ruled that the “separate but equal” doctrine of the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court ruling — the basis for legalized segregation in the United States — was a false premise and always had been.

“We conclude that in the field of public education ‘separate but equal’ has no place,” Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote in his opinion, underlining the last phrase in his reading copy. Then he delivered the hammer blow, underlining the entire next sentence: “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

The case, though focused on public schools, would apply to every facet of American life. No more “Colored Only” water fountains. The nation was entering a new era.

“Dear Chief: This is a day that will live in glory,” Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote to Warren in a short, handwritten memo. “It is also a great day in the history of the court.”

That the court had to issue another ruling the next year, saying the nation should integrate “with all deliberate speed,” and yet another in 1969, after more than a decade of civil rights upheavals across the country, demanding that integration take place “immediately,” showed how deeply (and violently) embedded segregation was in American society.

But back in 1954, Warren had not written in his opinion that the verdict was unanimous. It was critical that the nation understand that, he thought, so he penned it alongside the typewritten text in his reading copy, reminding him to say, “Therefore, we unanimously hold …,” when reading it aloud in court to a breathless, waiting nation.

He later recalled the electricity that shot through the room: “When the word ‘unanimously’ was spoken, a wave of emotion swept the room; no words or intentional movement, yet a distinct emotional manifestation that defies description.”

—Neely Tucker is a writer-editor in the Office of Communications.